Penerapan Kombinasi Metode SWARA dan MAUT Dalam Seleksi Penerimaan Calon Guru

  • Agung Deni Wahyudi Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia
  • Ari Sulistiyawati Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia
Keywords: Combination, MAUT, Acceptance, Selection, SWARA

Abstract

The selection process for teacher candidates is a critical step in ensuring the quality of quality education for students. In addition to assessing academic qualifications such as educational background and work experience, selection should also consider aspects such as communication skills, interpersonal skills, ability to manage classes, and dedication to the education profession. The main problem in the selection of teacher candidates is the difficulty in assessing qualitative aspects such as teaching skills, interpersonal communication, and leadership. The purpose of the research on the application of the combination of SWARA and MAUT methods in the selection of teacher candidate admissions is to develop a more effective and comprehensive approach in the selection process for teacher candidate admission. By combining the SWARA and MAUT methods, this study is to improve the objectivity and accuracy of assessment of teacher candidates based on established criteria. In addition, this study is also to understand the implications of the combination of these two methods on the final decision in the selection of teacher candidates, as well as to provide a strong theoretical foundation to improve the HR selection process in the field of education. The ranking results showed that the first highest score of 0.7043 was obtained by GY candidates and was entitled to 1st place, the second highest score of 0.5804 was obtained by AJ candidates and was entitled to 2nd place, and the third highest score of 0.5365 was obtained by MS candidates and was entitled to 3rd place in the selection of teacher candidate admissions. The results of ranking using a combination of SWARA and MAUT methods are recommendations for schools in the selection of teacher candidates.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Tembren and M. M. Tahar, “Penerimaan guru terhadap pelaksanaan program pendidikan khas integrasi (PPKI) di daerah Sibu,” J. Dunia Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 127–144, 2022.

A. Dudung, “Kompetensi profesional guru,” JKKP (Jurnal Kesejaht. Kel. Dan Pendidikan), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 9–19, 2018.

M. H. Sadeghiravesh, H. Khosravi, and A. Abolhasani, “Selecting proper sites for underground dam construction using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory in arid and semi-arid regions,” J. Mt. Sci., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 197–208, 2023.

I. Oktaria, “Kombinasi Metode Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) dan Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dalam Pemilihan Kegiatan Ekstrakulikuler,” J. Ilm. Inform. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2023.

H. Jaafaru and B. Agbelie, “Bridge maintenance planning framework using machine learning, multi-attribute utility theory and evolutionary optimization models,” Autom. Constr., vol. 141, p. 104460, 2022.

W. Saputra, S. A. Wardana, H. Wahyuda, and D. A. Megawaty, “Penerapan Kombinasi Metode Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) dan Rank Sum Dalam Pemilihan Siswa Terbaik,” J. Inf. Technol. Softw. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 12–21, 2024.

C. Campos Valverde, “Adding value to a mining corporation through project portfolio management: Combined approaches of portfolio theory and multi-attribute utility theory,” 2023.

A. Štilić, A. Puška, A. Đurić, and D. Božanić, “Electric Vehicles Selection Based on Brčko District Taxi Service Demands, a Multi-Criteria Approach,” Urban Sci., vol. 6, no. 4, p. 73, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.3390/urbansci6040073.

H. B. Santoso, I. W. Sriyasa, and P. Citra, “Kombinasi Metode SWARA dan SMART Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Berprestasi,” J. Artif. Intell. Technol. Inf., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 38–50, 2024, doi: 10.58602/jaiti.v2i1.102.

V. H. Saputra and S. Setiawansyah, “Penerapan Metode SWARA dan Grey Relational Analysis Dalam Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik,” J. Artif. Intell. Technol. Inf., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 51–61, 2024.

P. Rani et al., “Hesitant fuzzy SWARA-complex proportional assessment approach for sustainable supplier selection (HF-SWARA-COPRAS),” Symmetry (Basel)., vol. 12, no. 7, p. 1152, 2020.

D. Stanujkić et al., “A new grey approach for using SWARA and PIPRECIA methods in a group decision-making environment,” Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 13, p. 1554, 2021.

A. F. Pasaribu, A. Surahman, A. T. Priandika, S. Sintaro, and Y. T. Utami, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerimaan Guru Menggunakan SAW,” J. Artif. Intell. Technol. Inf., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13–19, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.58602/jaiti.v1i1.21.

H. B. Santoso, “Metode Pembobotan Simplified Pivot Pairwise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment dan COPRAS Dalam Penentuan Seleksi Penerimaan Guru,” J. Artif. Intell. Technol. Inf., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 154–163, 2023, doi: 10.58602/jaiti.v1i4.84.

A. Pulungan and B. Hendrik, “Implementasi Metode SAW Pada Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Untuk Penerimaan Guru Di Pesantren Darul Mursyid,” J. Penelit. Teknol. Inf. Dan Sains, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 47–53, 2023, doi: 10.54066/jptis.v1i3.766.

H. Sulistiani, Setiawansyah, P. Palupiningsih, F. Hamidy, P. L. Sari, and Y. Khairunnisa, “Employee Performance Evaluation Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) with PIPRECIA-S Weighting: A Case Study in Education Institution,” in 2023 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Informations System (ICIMCIS), 2023, pp. 369–373. doi: 10.1109/ICIMCIS60089.2023.10349017.

Published
2024-04-15
How to Cite
Wahyudi, A. D., & Sulistiyawati, A. (2024). Penerapan Kombinasi Metode SWARA dan MAUT Dalam Seleksi Penerimaan Calon Guru. Jurnal Media Borneo, 1(3), 94-103. https://doi.org/10.58602/mediaborneo.v1i3.58