Implementasi Metode SMART Untuk Penentuan Kepala Departemen Berprestasi
Abstract
The head of the department is a figure who plays an important role in carrying out the functions and operations of the department in an organization or institution. Its main tasks include human resource management, development of work programs, supervision of policy implementation, and solving internal problems that arise. One of the main problems in determining the head of the outstanding department is the difficulty in evaluating the leadership qualities and managerial abilities of prospective candidates. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of the SMART method in evaluating the performance of department heads, identifying factors that contribute to the success of department heads, as well as determining relevant and weighty criteria for assessing their achievements. The SMART method provides a systematic and measurable framework to facilitate informed and objective decision making in the performance appraisal of department heads. The ranking of determining outstanding department heads is based on the results of the performance evaluation of department heads using the SMART method. The department head with the highest utility value will get the top rank as the outstanding department head. The ranking results show that the head of the department excels based on the application of the SMART method, namely the Head of the Customer Service Department gets rank 1, followed by rank 2 Head of Warehouse Department, and rank 3 Head of Human Resources Department.
Downloads
References
C. Brandmo, D. Tiplic, and E. Elstad, “Antecedents of department heads’ job autonomy, role clarity, and self-efficacy for instructional leadership,” Int. J. Leadersh. Educ., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 411–430, May 2021, doi: 10.1080/13603124.2019.1580773.
M. Darmowiyono et al., “Application of the Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) Method in the selection of thrush medicine products based on consumers,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1783, no. 1, p. 012015, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1783/1/012015.
R. R. Oprasto, “Decision Support System for Selecting the Best Raw Material Supplier Using Simple Multi Attribute Rating Method Technique,” J. Ilm. Comput. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10–18, 2023, doi: 10.58602/jics.v2i1.12.
S. H. Hadad, “Metode Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) dan Rank Reciprocal (RR) dalam Penentuan Penerima Beasiswa,” J. Data Sci. Inf. Syst., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 18–28, 2024, doi: 10.58602/dimis.v2i1.99.
S. Surati, S. Siswanti, and A. Kusumaningrum, “Metode Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique Untuk Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Penerima Beasiswa,” J. Ilm. SINUS, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 57–66, 2022.
D. Borissova and D. Keremedchiev, “Group decision making in evaluation and ranking of students by extended simple multi-attribute rating technique,” Cybern. Inf. Technol., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 45–56, 2019.
A. Bustomi, “Sistem Rekomendasi Pemilihan Kinerja Koperasi Terbaik Menggunakan Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique Method,” J. Inf. Technol. Softw. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 135–142, 2023, doi: 10.58602/itsecs.v1i4.72.
C. A. V. Haris, Y. Meliyana, E. Novita, and D. A. Megawaty, “Multi-Attribute Decision Making Seleksi Kandidat Ketua OSIS Menggunakan Metode SMART,” J. Data Sci. Inf. Syst., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 175–181, 2023.
H. Hasugian, A. U. Hamdani, W. Wulandari, and N. Nofiyani, “Penerapan Metode SMART Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekrutmen Karyawan Baru,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 189–198, 2023.
S. Setiawansyah, S. Sintaro, V. H. Saputra, and A. A. Aldino, “Combination of Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) and Simplified Pivot Pairwise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment (PIPRECIA-S) in Determining the Best Staff,” Bull. Informatics Data Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 57, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.61944/bids.v2i2.67.
S. Sintaro, A. A. Aldino, S. Setiawansyah, and V. H. Saputra, “Combination of Multi-Objective Optimization on the basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) and Pivot Pairwise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment (PIPRECIA) in Determining the Best Cashier,” J. Comput. Informatics Res., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 133–140, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.47065/comforch.v3i1.969.
S. Situmorang, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Kepala Divisi Baru FBS Hotel Menara Lexus Menggunakan Metode ROC dan MABAC,” KOMIK (Konferensi Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 615–624, 2023, doi: 10.30865/komik.v6i1.5726.
M. N. D. Satria, “Penerapan Metode Visekriterijumsko Kompromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR) Dalam Seleksi Kepala Gudang,” J. Media Borneo, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 47–54, 2023.
M. Mafrizal and I. Ilyas, “DESAIN SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN SELEKSI CALON KEPALA DESA DI KABUPATEN INDRAGIRI HILIR.,” Selodang Mayang J. Ilm. Badan Perenc. Pembang. Drh. Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 14–22, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.47521/selodangmayang.v7i1.197.
A. L. Teba, A. A. Rangga, and M. M. Ngongo, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN SELEKSI PENGANGKATAN CALON KEPALA SEKOLAH SMP NEGERI PADA DINAS PENDIDIKAN DAN OLAHRAGA DAERAH WAIKABUBAK DENGAN METODE AHP,” J. Valtech, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 148–152, 2023.
Setiawansyah, A. A. Aldino, P. Palupiningsih, G. F. Laxmi, E. D. Mega, and I. Septiana, “Determining Best Graduates Using TOPSIS with Surrogate Weighting Procedures Approach,” in 2023 International Conference on Networking, Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology (IConNECT), 2023, pp. 60–64. doi: 10.1109/IConNECT56593.2023.10327119.
Copyright (c) 2024 Tri Widodo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.