Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Siswa Praktik Kerja Lapangan Terbaik Menggunakan Metode A New Additive Ratio Assessment

Dyah Ayu Megawaty

doi:10.58602/mediaborneo.v1i3.61

Dyah Ayu Megawaty Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.58602/mediaborneo.v1i3.61

Keywords: A New Additive Ratio Assessment, Decision, Application, PKL, Recommendations

Abstract

Student Field Work Practice (PKL) is an educational program that provides students with opportunities to gain work experience in an industrial or corporate environment. Through PKL, students can apply the knowledge they have learned in school in a real-world context, as well as gain an understanding of the work process and demands of a particular profession. The problem in this study is the difficulty in assessing the quality and potential of students holistically. Student performance evaluations are often based solely on academic achievement or previous work experience, which may not fully reflect the student's abilities and personality in the actual work environment. The purpose of this study is to implement the A New Additive Ratio Assessment method in the development of a decision support system to select the best PKL students. Using the A New Additive Ratio Assessment method, this study aims to identify and obtain optimal ratings from student candidates based on a number of predetermined criteria. Through the application of the A New Additive Ratio Assessment method provides an effective tool for decision makers, in selecting PKL students who best suit the needs and requirements set. The recommendation results show the rank of 1 best PKL student with an optimization function value of 0.9695, namely IS Students. These results can be a recommendation for companies in determining the Best PKL Students by applying the A New Additive Ratio Assessment method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Juri, H. Maksum, W. Purwanto, and E. Indrawan, “Evaluasi Program Praktik Kerja Lapangan dengan Metode CIPP,” J. Penelit. dan Pengemb. Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 3, p. 323, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.23887/jppp.v5i3.38439.

A. Andriansyah, T. Wurijanto, and A. Ayuningtyas, “Implementasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Siswa Praktik Kerja Lapangan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,” Justek J. Sains dan Teknol., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 403–417, 2023, doi: 10.31764/justek.v6i4.19203.

A. A. Alkodri, F. Fitriyani, and A. Anisah, “Pemilihan Siswa Praktek Kerja Industri Berbasis Komputer Terbaik Menggunakan Metode AHP,” Brahmana J. Penerapan Kecerdasan Buatan, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 58–66, 2023, doi: 10.30645/brahmana.v5i1.278.

A. Q. Adyan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penempatan Praktik Kerja Lapangan Berdasarkan Nilai Komptensi Dasar Dan Nilai Sikap Siswa Menggunakan Metode Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid dan Metode Profile Matching,” Rekursif J. Inform., vol. 8, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.33369/rekursif.v8i1.7932.

V. Komasilovs, R. Mills, A. Kviesis, F. Mondada, and A. Zacepins, “Architecture of a decentralised decision support system for futuristic beehives,” Biosyst. Eng., vol. 240, pp. 56–61, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2024.02.017.

Setiawansyah, S. Sintaro, and A. A. Aldino, “MCDM Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory and PIPRECIA in Customer Loan Eligibility Recommendations,” J. Informatics, Electr. Electron. Eng., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 212–220, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.47065/jieee.v3i2.1628.

M. Kayacık, H. Dinçer, and S. Yüksel, “Using quantum spherical fuzzy decision support system as a novel sustainability index approach for analyzing industries listed in the stock exchange,” Borsa Istanbul Rev., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1145–1157, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.bir.2022.10.001.

A. Raynaldi, A. Ikhwan, and M. D. Irawan, “Implementasi AHP Dan Promethee Dalam Pemilihan Bengkel Resmi Terbaik Di Deli Serdang,” J-SISKO TECH (Jurnal Teknol. Sist. Inf. dan Sist. Komput. TGD), vol. 6, no. 2, p. 687, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.53513/jsk.v6i2.8363.

T. Dhiki, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Kost Di Sekitaran Kampus Universitas Flores Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Saw),” JUPITER J. Penelit. Ilmu dan Teknol. Komput., vol. 14, no. 2-b SE-Articles, pp. 413–422, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.5281./5148/5.jupiter.2022.10.

J. H. Lubis, S. Esabella, M. Mesran, D. Desyanti, and D. M. Simanjuntak, “Penerapan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) Dalam Pemilihan Karyawan yang di Non-Aktifkan di Masa Pandemi,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 969–978, 2022.

A. D. Wahyudi, “Analisis Kepuasan Terhadap Pelayanan Supplier Menggunakan Metode A New Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS),” J. Artif. Intell. Technol. Inf., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2024, doi: 10.58602/jaiti.v2i1.105.

S. B. Atim and R. Arundaa, “Metode A New Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) Dalam Penentuan Pegawai Honor Berprestasi,” J. Inf. Technol. Softw. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 40–48, 2024, doi: 10.58602/itsecs.v2i1.96.

V. Sihombing et al., “Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) Method for Selecting English Course Branch Locations,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, vol. 1933, no. 1, p. 12070.

S. Sintaro, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Barista Terbaik Menggunakan Rank Sum dan Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS),” J. Ilm. Comput. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 39–49, 2023, doi: 10.58602/jics.v2i1.15.

S. H. Hadad, “Penerapan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) Dalam Pemilihan Guru Terbaik,” Chain J. Comput. Technol. Comput. Eng. Informatics, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 170–178, 2023.

S. A. B. Siburian, M. T. A. Zaen, D. Siregar, E. W. Ambarsari, and Y. Jumaryadi, “Penerapan Metode Additive Ratio Assement (ARAS) dalam Pemilihan Customer Service Terbaik,” J. Informatics Manag. Inf. Technol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 12–17, 2023.

Setiawansyah, A. A. Aldino, P. Palupiningsih, G. F. Laxmi, E. D. Mega, and I. Septiana, “Determining Best Graduates Using TOPSIS with Surrogate Weighting Procedures Approach,” in 2023 International Conference on Networking, Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology (IConNECT), 2023, pp. 60–64. doi: 10.1109/IConNECT56593.2023.10327119.

M. W. Arshad, “Combination of Multi-Attributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis and Rank Order Centroid in Supplier Performance Evaluation,” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 2330–2341, 2024, doi: 10.30865/klik.v4i4.1677.